And therein lies the trap. It's something several friends of mine can attest to is a common obstacle when writing historical fiction. That is problem is over-research.
The incentive for research is strong. Many is the time a writer will find themselves raked over the coals by self-declared experts in reviews. There is also often a real urgency to do justice to the subject or the personages involved and be true to their story. But more than that, as with anything that generates enough enthusiasm to write about, an author simply enjoys the research, to lose oneself in the past, as any good historical fiction will do to a reader.
I've recently read City of Thieves by David Benioff, one of Game of Thrones's showrunnera. It was an
excellent read and comes highly recommended. One part that struck me the most, however, was not in the main narrative, but in the prologue, in which the author recounts how he learned about what his grandfather did during World War II. After the author has spent a week with his grandfather and a dictaphone, drawing out a flood of recollections from the normally reticent man, he is still agonizing over the details. He wants more out of his grandfather. The exchange goes like this:
"I just want to make sure I get everything right."Truly, this feels like some of the best advice you could get as a writer of historical fiction. When in doubt, don't forget, you're a writer. Make it up!
"You won't"
"This is your story. I don't want to fuck with it."
"David-"
"A couple of things still don't make sense to me-"
"David," he said. "You're a writer. Make it up."
No comments:
Post a Comment